Paper Moon

Just finished reading India Authentic's thirteenth issue, "Saraswati." It wasn't so much about Saraswati as it was about Kalidasa, the legendary poet and playwright about whom little biographical information is known, but plenty of folk stories abound.

And, inevitably, I found myself comparing and contrasting IA's take on Kalidasa's life with that told in the Amar Chitra Katha comic book, "Kalidasa."

( Behind this cut: 18 scans and 4.8 megabytes total bandwidth-suckage. You've been warned. )

1. Stunning Catwoman doll by Takara:


Click for high-res

Part of the Cool Girls line.

2. Grant Morrison will be giving out an MBX Sketchbook to the lucky bastards at SDCC.

Not like I'm dying to see the character designs and his personal notes, or anything. (*dies*)

I'm still basking the afterglow. This was a good one.

Warning: There are spoilers in this review.

( We brought some good violence with us, and we're going to use it! )

Time for more comic reviews, I guess.

Look, okay. I liked Dave Stewart's previous Virgin project, Walk-In. It was problematic, but I liked it. But this? This was just bad. And that's a shame, too, because the premise sounded so cool. Plus, you know, zombies.

So anyway, ( what went wrong. )

So that's Zombie Broadway. I didn't like it. I've already shluffed my copy over into the "crap that Nena has to remember to sell on ebay" pile. And it's a shame, because, like I said, I enjoyed Dave Stewart's other Virgin project, and, you know, I like zombies.

Speaking of which...

( Whatever happened to Walk-In? )

[54] Devi icons.

Nothing fancy, because the artwork speaks for itself.

( I has a flaming sword. )


Scans that I used to make these, because I feel like sharing: Part One | Part Two

That's a bunch of random - but totally awesome - pages from Devi #1 through #17.

It was really, really hard to find icon-able panels of some characters, particularly Kratha and Avni.

...Why yes, I did order the first issue of the Devi/Witchblade crossover. As it combines something that I love (Devi) with something that I absolutely can't stand (Witchblade), I'm more curious that ever to see how this is going to turn out.

Edited to add: Oh, hell. Virgin, you suck. :( Way to go with the terrible PR there. Here's a hint, Mr. Lieberman: You want prominent comics bloggers at your party. You want to schmooze with them and impress them, especially if they've said critical things about your business model. A party is a chance for you to win over the bloggers and journalists, yes, even those who have criticized you. I mean, holy hell. How much dumber can a "Chief Marketing Officer" get?!



Edited again, many moons after the fact: I have a folder full of high-res scans from the final issues of Devi, and from the Devi/Witchblade crossover, that I had intended to turn into icons eventually. I don't think that I'll ever get around to making said icons, however, but I don't want the pretty scans to go to waste, either! Hence I am releasing my folder o'scans into the wild, just in case anybody else wants to use them as fodder for icons or whatever.

Here is a preview of the scans available:



Click here to download these scans in a zip file.


Enjoy!

Continuing tonight's theme of Virgin Comics-related posts, here's ( Jenna Jameson's Shadow Hunter. )

Sitting around and waiting for my once-every-couple-months order of Virgin comics to come in, I've been amusing myself by plowing through my still giant stack of unread Amar Chitra Katha comics.

And then I found this: THE single greatest panel of Bhima ever created.

( Yudhisthdickery behind the cut. )

I think that speaks for itself. From #174/703 Tales of Yudhisthira.

Also, is the artwork in Karna really done by Ram Waeerkar? Really?! Because that's the artist credit on my copy (third printing of the Deluxe Edition), but the artwork looks NOTHING like Ram Waeerkar's distinctive style. Huh.

In follow-up to this:

But, Ms. Whiny Entitled Fangirl, you may ask, don't you know that sex sells? Don't you think it's unfair to ask Marvel and DC to stop making comics that appeal to the Scaly Basement-Dwelling Stereotyped Fanboy just because you want to buy a couple of their products?

The obvious answer to that is: Good comics appeal to everybody, including the Scaly Basement-Dwelling Stereotyped Fanboy. So doesn't it make more sense to make comics that more people are going to want to buy? And good comics can be sexy. They just shouldn't be sexist.

First, an observation: I'm not sure why so many guys are defending Marvel and DC's insistent push to cater only to the typical bottom-feeding Scaly Basement-Dwelling Stereotyped Fanboy in the first place. (For the sake of brevity, the Scaly Basement-Dwelling Stereotyped Fanboy shall hereby be referred to as Ghost, in honor of his comments here.) I mean, isn't that a huge insult against your gender and your hobby, you guys reading this? For the executives at Marvel and DC to treat you as if you are a desperate lonely slob who could never make it with a real woman and thus have to content yourselves with comics about scantily-clad superheroines being raped instead? To assume that you are all the Ghosts of the world? To assume that this (NSFW) is the only way to appeal to you? To assume that you would actually rather have that than this or this?

Isn't the fact that Marvel and DC target a mythical stereotype of a skeezy comics fanboy an insult to everyone across the board, whether you're male or female?

And therein lies the problem. Oh ye Ghosts of the world, let me make an assumption of my own: I think that you would enjoy this, or this, or this, or this, or this, or this. Maybe you would enjoy this (NSFW) or this (NSFS) more than all of the previous. But the point is, I bet you wouldn't NOT buy a comic because it had this on the cover. If you really wanted a Wonder Woman statue, you wouldn't NOT buy this statue just because she's not topless. You might not buy it for other reasons, but that's neither here nor there. We're talking about sex appeal in this post. Sex appeal!

But the same doesn't work in reverse. A whole lotta people are not going to buy Heroes for Hire because of that disgusting sexist cover. For example, see here. And a whole lot of people aren't going to buy that Mary-Jane statue or anything Marvel-related for a looong time, because of the fact that said statue is disgusting. Sexist and ugly. Double-threat!

So here's the issue. Sexy stuff appeals to everyone, including the Ghosts of the world. Sexist stuff may get the Ghosts of the world to fork over their hard-earned money without a blinking moment of hesitation, but it alienates a huge chunk of the potential audience that could otherwise be reached. So why not just be sexy, not sexist? Why not appeal to everyone, instead of just the scaly basement-dwelling few?

Oh, and by the way: the above-mentioned marketing model works. Runaways, a good old-fashioned teen superhero story with lots of sexiness and little sexism, is Marvel's best-selling digest in April. And for more proof that sexy money talks louder than sexist money, scroll to the bottom of this post.

I've said this before in a previous wank: Marketing towards men =/= alienating women. You can make, and market, comics that appeal to stereotypical male interests, such as manly he-men punching semitrucks and beautiful women kicking righteous ass. You can do these things without insulting or degrading anyone. Just make that beautiful woman a person and not a sex object. It's not hard to do. Give her realistic anatomy and a functional costume, give her a personality, and draw her in a pose that reflects that personality. Note that "realistic anatomy" can be hubba-hubba hot, a "functional costume" can still be sexy as hell, and a powerful action pose, such as kicking or punching, can show off a woman's anatomy without forcing her to pose like a limp blow-up doll in the process. So now, voila, you can appeal to your target demographic and not alienate anyone else who might be interested in buying your comics.

Standard disclaimer, because I really shouldn't have to explain this, but recently certain Eisner-nominated comics journalists have proven otherwise: Real, actual pornography is different. The market rules are different, and you can alienate whoever the hell you want with your sexual fantasies. But mainstream superhero comics are NOT pornography, they are NOT YOUR sexual fantasies, and any attempts to answer an argument about marketing mainstream superhero comics with examples from pornography are just really, really missing the point.

Further linkage: A marketing guy who actually knows what he's talking about makes some good points about money, and how, like, it's smart to not discourage us wimmins from spending such. ;) And Websnark weighs in with an insightful post about brand management here. And a nifty post here from Stars and Garters, which may be a new blog with only two posts, but both of them rock so far.