That is interesting. I've never seen 300, but I think I understand what you mean. I can understand your disappointment too. I guess because most people are not homosexual, heterosexual romances are explored more in literature, healthy, unhealthy and otherwise. I think the answer is for concerned homosexual authors, or those who symphasize with them, to write their own literature exploring gay relationships. Still, I think Dumbledore of all people being gay should be a positive thing for gay people, if anything. If Voldemort had been the only gay man in Harry Potter, there'd really be trouble.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
I guess because most people are not homosexual, heterosexual romances are explored more in literature, healthy, unhealthy and otherwise. I think the answer is for concerned homosexual authors, or those who symphasize with them, to write their own literature exploring gay relationships.
Still, I think Dumbledore of all people being gay should be a positive thing for gay people, if anything. If Voldemort had been the only gay man in Harry Potter, there'd really be trouble.