Your picture isn't porn. If you ripped off the girl's bras (or whatever you'd call what they're wearing) to the point where the nipples should be clearly visible front and center, then erase the nipples and re-draw them in an anatomically impossible position on the side of the boobs, add a penis-like tentacle dripping "dishsoap" on one of the breasts, chain up the women in such a way that their chests are impossibly thrusting out at the viewer.... Yeah, then we'd be talking porn. But without? It's just two girls in their underwear. Their sexual assets are not on display. And they're not in a pose/situation clearly meant to invoke any common pornographic tropes.

If not, then you'll have to explain to me why not, and why that reason trumps a population that potentially exceeds that of "comics fandom".

Did the entire population of Gaia Online comment on your picture?

So I would like to hear it from you, and I'll consider the matter discussed and over with.

I'll hold you to that, pal. Because your alarmist, increasingly disconnected-from-reality ramblings about porn and the tyranny of dynamic language are growing tiresome. And the Digital Millenium Act was about copyright protection, not about censoring or limiting access to porn.