http://stop-him.livejournal.com/36172.html --That's my feelings on comics retailers, Eisner-award-winning or otherwise.
And, well, I'm sure that, of all the retailers interested in contacting Lea Hernandez, most of them would be against the cover. How many retailers who support the cover would feel like telling her they support the cover? If I were a retailer, why would I bother? To get her to scold me, to pick a fight? Seeing a comment in Lea's LJ from someone who supports Lea's position is not particularly amazing... and anecdotal examples of "I hate the cover too" only carry so much weight.
The remix - I was asking more about the release of the original cover - I don't foresee anyone handing the cover back to the original artist and saying "do it again, but not wrong and evil this time."
As for semantics: well, if you don't want to go there, I won't belabor the point too much. I will close, though, by saying that if you insist on defining something as porn which other people do not see as porn, it's an argument that will resurface repeatedly.
no subject
And, well, I'm sure that, of all the retailers interested in contacting Lea Hernandez, most of them would be against the cover. How many retailers who support the cover would feel like telling her they support the cover? If I were a retailer, why would I bother? To get her to scold me, to pick a fight? Seeing a comment in Lea's LJ from someone who supports Lea's position is not particularly amazing... and anecdotal examples of "I hate the cover too" only carry so much weight.
The remix - I was asking more about the release of the original cover - I don't foresee anyone handing the cover back to the original artist and saying "do it again, but not wrong and evil this time."
As for semantics: well, if you don't want to go there, I won't belabor the point too much. I will close, though, by saying that if you insist on defining something as porn which other people do not see as porn, it's an argument that will resurface repeatedly.