nenena: (Default)
nenena ([personal profile] nenena) wrote2011-02-28 05:42 pm

Madoka Magica revisited.

The danger of leaving long thinky-thought comments in my livejournal is that you get me going all thinky-thoughts in response.

[livejournal.com profile] phoenix_z's comment here actually got me thinking about the third reason that I can't stand Madoka Magica, and that is because of the squickish combination of an all-male writing and directing staff plus an aggressive marketing campaign targeted toward an older, male audience. And if anybody reading this is serious about defending the notion that this show has some sort of Message about... I dunno, magic as false empowerment or whatever, then I think it's important to start asking questions like:

If Madoka Magica is meant to deconstruct the notion that magic can be empowering to little girls, who exactly is this message aimed at? (The answer: Adult men. Madoka Magica is absolutely not being promoted in any media outlets targeted towards girls or women. It's being promoted strictly to an adult male audience.)

Is there something maybe a bit problematic about an adult male writing staff sending the message that magic falsely empowers little girls to an audience of mostly adult men? (Answer: Yes.)

If we can really buy the idea that Madoka Magica is intended to teach the lesson that real strength doesn't come from magic, then why isn't this message in a series for little girls marketed toward little girls? (Answer: Because that would actually make Madoka Magica an empowering deconstruction of the magical girl genre. But that's not what SHAFT is interested in doing. The creative staff's thought process seems to have started and stopped at "let's show how magic can be bad" without having considered any of the implications of who was writing the show or for what audience.)

If the show is intended as a general "magic can be false empowerment" message separate from a deconstruction of magical girl empowerment specifically, then that again brings us around to the question of why the creative staff thought that the best way to convey this message was to show a bunch of vulnerable moe little girls being tortured and terrified week after week in a show that is aggressively marketed toward an adult male audience in the first place. (Answer: Because fanservice, that's why.)

This. This is why I can't stand Madoka Magica. It's not that I don't like the idea of deconstructing the magical girl genre period - in case that still needs to be clarified for anybody - but it's just that Madoka Magica is DOIN IT WRONG.

Eridan humping a buoy is clearly the most appropriate icon for this post.

PS - Once again, since I know that a lot of people on my flist enjoy Madoka Magica for a variety of reasons, if you like the show and all that's perfectly fine, there's nothing wrong with that, you don't need to defend your enjoyment of the show to anybody, least of all to me. But I don't like the show and now I've said why.




Post-mortem, added April 28th: Since Google shows that this post is now being linked in several places where the shit that went down a couple nights ago is being dissected by curious gawkers, I feel like there are a couple of things that I need to clear the air about:

1. Yes, I deleted a fuckton of anonymous comments that were little more than one-sentence misogynistic insults. There was a pretty steady barrage of them for hours on end on Monday night.

2. I was in a very, very bad headspace Monday night after having dealt with an extremely trying day at work, and I was absolutely not on a mental state where I could have dealt with any of this well. Which is why I didn't deal with it well. ^^;; I accidentally deleted some actually substansive comments, was an asshole in response to some other coments, and generally behaved poorly. For that much I apologize.

3. Quite a few of the comments that I deleted said something to the effect that I was only angry about sexism in anime because I never had to deal with sexism IRL, and how very dare I etc. Well, guess why I was completely exhausted, angry, and in a very bad headspace after my day at work on Monday? I'll give you a hint: it starts with a "sexual" and ends with "harassment" and it is something that I had been dealing with for a long time at my school that kind of came to a head on Monday. To come home from that to face a string of anonymous comments accusing me of "not knowing what real sexism is" or not caring about fighting sexism IRL - not just sexism directed at myself, but sexism directed at my co-workers and female students that I deal with every day - was a huge fucking slap in the face. Which of course all fed into my reactions re: point #2 above.

4. I realize now that there are a lot of flaws in my arguments. Damned if I was going to admit to any of that on Monday night though. There's nothing quite like being inundated with a flood of misogynistic trolling to convince oneself that she's completely in the right and that everybody arguing against her is just part of the shitlicking internet hate machine. ;)

5. I still do not like Madoka, I still think that it's ass, but I truly honestly am completely fine with other people liking the show and I can't invalidate anybody else's lens for viewing the show, whether they see a progressive and empowering reading in it or not. This was my position from the beginning - if you doubt that, just read through the comments on my first post about Madoka - albeit it was a position that I admittedly forgot to uphold when I started responding to the comments here (see point #2 above). But it was also originally the reason why I confined my venting about the show to my own journal and never posted my personal frustrations with the show anywhere where people were squeeing over it. But just as y'all have every right to love and to interpret the show however you wish, I also have the right to really dislike the show from my own pespective, and yeah, I don't appreciate complete strangers coming into my journal - on a two-month-old entry, no less! - and trying to argue with me about how my reasons for disliking the show are TOTES INVALID. I never confronted any of you in your spaces with arguments as to why you were WRONG WRONG WRONG to enjoy Madoka and I would have appreciated it if y'all had extended the same courtesy to me.

6. Yes, I like a lot of animu and manga that is intended to be moe or marketed toward a male audience or is full of sexism and/or fanpandering. I can find empowering storylines in male-oriented, fanservice-laden media and that's exactly why I understand how some people can see the same in Madoka. But I'm honest about the fact that I like material with significant flaws or problematic aspects. Madoka fandom, on the other hand, has so far exhibited an extremely depressing tendency to flip their collective shit whenever somebody points out that there could be something sexist in the source material. No, I am not talking about just my post here. I've seen some pretty epic fandumb from Madoka fans on tumblr and in some locked posts on my flist before, and this is not okay.



7. Having said that, though, the main argument in this post - the one that quickly got lost in all of the derailing and cluelessness in the comments - is not that "Madoka is sexist because it was written by men," but rather that the idea of Madoka as a deconstruction of the idea that magical girls are empowering is problematic because it was written by a staff composed entirely of men, and not just any men, but a couple of notoriously sexist men at that. (Seriously, don't any of you follow Gen Urobuchi on twitter?) It would be like if Dave Sims and Frank Miller got together and said "Let's make a cartoon that deconstructs the idea that Wonder Woman is empowering to women because she's actually totally not." There's nothing inherently wrong with that concept, but people would be right to side-eye it if it was being written and produced by two of the most notoriously sexist men in the comics industry. Maybe they're not the right people to be doing that show because their negative attitudes towards women will show through in the final product. And I would argue that the same thing happened with Madoka: Urobuchi and company's neckbeardy attitude toward women showed throughout the series, whether it was the fact that Sayaka's confrontation against the creepy men on the train was presented as evidence that she was turning evil, or the idiotic "Joan of Arc saved France because QB granted her wish!" stuff, or the pancake-faced moe moe character designs, or the very ending in and of itself. Although in the end this is a moot point because I think the series finale made it very clear that Madoka *isn't* intended to be a deconstruction of the idea that magic is empowering to girls. But at the time that this post was written, that was the concept that the series was getting the most praise for, and that was why I wrote this response.



8. Final concluding link, for those of you to who may still need it: The FedEx Arrow and How To Deal With It. Extremely relevant to this post, I swear.

9. Okay, no, one more bit of snark. I'm still amazed that anybody would hold up Madoka's mom as an example of how awesomely feminist this series is when Heartcatch Precure just finished airing on TV. Career women with significant relationships with their magical girl daughters are NOT unique to Madoka, people! They're a fairly common fixture of magical girl shows already. And why are we lavishing praise on Madoka for having great mother-daughter relationships when only ONE of the five girls has a mother who appears onscreen and two of the five girls have mothers who are tragically dead? Just for a quick comparison, Heartcatch Precure has four magical girls, all four of whom have living mothers who appear onscreen and who have strong relationships with their daughters, and three of the four mothers have careers outside their homes. Just saying. Madoka's mom is great and all, but stop fucking upholding Madoka Magica as being the greatest portrayal of mother-daughter relationships in anime when so may other magical girl shows DO THAT BETTER.

[identity profile] chiikaboom.livejournal.com 2011-03-01 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
Ick its always creepy when you find out a show you enjoy that happens to be filled with moe girls is written by a bunch of guys. And that its supposed to be targeted to an adult male audience.

Thats what made the Dance in the Vampire Bund manga that much creepier.

Thing is it still attracts people who arent guys watching this stuff solely for fanservice (liiike me) but ive already said my opinion on the series so I wont bother.

[identity profile] ash-ka-chan.livejournal.com 2011-03-01 01:03 am (UTC)(link)
I'm so, so glad that I'm not the only one who hates Madoka. I'm about ready to strangle people who like it for all the wrong reasons. (Mostly people who say that it's original.)

The fact that Madoka is done by a bunch of guys, last time I checked the only notable female staff member is the composer, speaks above and beyond in itself. I find it creepy, actually.

I actually typed a rant on Madoka a short while ago. Mostly on the animation, studio, and director. Mostly the animation, since I'm a animation buff. Here it is. () My writing style is erratic though, so yeah.

[identity profile] broccoman.livejournal.com 2011-03-01 05:02 am (UTC)(link)
I suspected it was directed to adult men.

I think I'm still holding out some hope that the ending will justify some of this. If it doesn't, I get a nice fanservicey ride, which makes it better then 90% of the stuff released these days.


A webcomic you might like that seems a little more empowering:
http://www.drunkduck.com/Essay_Bee_Comics_Presents_Fusion/

You might like this.
ext_6355: (Default)

[identity profile] nenena.livejournal.com 2011-03-01 06:25 am (UTC)(link)
THANK YOU for calling out the animation as crap.

Seriously, I can't believe how often the animation quality of this show is praised. It's choppy and has an extremely low frame rate, but I guess it manages to look *~quality~* because of the lighting effects and Gainax-esque cinematography shortcuts.

[identity profile] broccoman.livejournal.com 2011-03-01 09:12 am (UTC)(link)
It has pretty character designs, but animation-wise, it's average at best. Then again, you don't get good animation all that much these days.

One of my artist friends rants on how poor animation quality is these days on most shows, and he's right.

[identity profile] ash-ka-chan.livejournal.com 2011-03-01 01:31 pm (UTC)(link)
I have to be honest here, I didn't put this in my rant, but the creepy stuff in Madoka, like the witches and that, but it DOES look a little choppy too. Like they didn't want to extract real world objects or something.

Also, this is totally related: At times I love 4Chan. (http://images.puella-magi.net/a/ac/Meduka_1_cleaned.jpg)

[identity profile] ash-ka-chan.livejournal.com 2011-03-01 01:36 pm (UTC)(link)
I still have hope. I love Star Driver's animation, and it's a recent anime. (Then again, BONES is a good at animation.) And Yumekui Merry has excellent animation. (For JC Staff anyway.) Plus a bunch of other recent anime series.

As long as we have Pixar, I'm all good.~

[identity profile] broccoman.livejournal.com 2011-03-01 01:45 pm (UTC)(link)
The thing that made the decline noticable for me was comparing the first Ippo anime to the second. The first one was so much better.

Even my friend who I was seeing, who saw both side by side and never saw Ippo before, that was the first thing she noticed.

ext_6355: (Default)

[identity profile] nenena.livejournal.com 2011-03-01 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
QUALITY ANIMATION. Quality.

[identity profile] pachilove.livejournal.com 2011-03-02 04:32 am (UTC)(link)
I was watching it for the creep factor of the story but now I'm kinda creeped out at the main audience for it.
Thanks for the info on that!
Is gonna watch it through anyway

(Anonymous) 2011-03-06 06:23 am (UTC)(link)
I think you misunderstood the message the series is trying to deconstruct, it's not about empowerment

First we have to consider why it's audience (adult males) wouls watch this kind of show (magical girls)

The answer? MOE

The show is saying "maho shoujo are sooo moe amirite? Well REAL maho shoujo would be all dying and conflicted and shit and that NOT MOE"

Which is supposed to be enlightening somehow
ext_6355: (Default)

[identity profile] nenena.livejournal.com 2011-03-06 07:36 am (UTC)(link)
I didn't say that that was the message of the show. I was bouncing off of [livejournal.com profile] phoenix_z's comment.

Either way this:

Well REAL maho shoujo would be all dying and conflicted and shit and that NOT MOE

This is NOT A DECONSTRUCTION.

Because magical girl shows as they exist already are full of little girls dying and being conflicted and shit. They just do so in less gory ways.

(Anonymous) 2011-03-06 08:32 am (UTC)(link)
The gore is the point actually

What I meant is that Madoka as a series was originally marketed as an inoffensive cute show for grown men who watch late anime; you shouldn't compare to any magical girl series that don't cater to that crowd

We must always take the context in mind when discussing media and this series is ultimately was presented as a moe series first and a magical girl series second

And since (theoretically) something that's gruesome cannot be cute the show does it's best to present the cute element as evil and perverted underneath is cuteness

Yes Paranoia Agent did it better

And yes is a very limited message for very limited audience

But that's what i'm trying to say; this is fringe otaku show and should be judged on those merits and it should be criticized according to what it is

Let me clarify that personally I don't find Madoka to be a good show, it's an ok show and, for what I understand it only gained so much notoriety because all the other anime this season is quite bad, but I don't think it should be judges as any other thing as what it is

It's like complaining that Jackass is crass, of course is crass but you judge it in comparison to other crass shows

Madoka is for people who go "OMG MOE! fapfapfap" and that should be taken into account while disscusing it
ext_6355: (Default)

[identity profile] nenena.livejournal.com 2011-03-06 10:03 am (UTC)(link)
I am going to just refer you to my first post about Madoka Magica (http://nenena.livejournal.com/301588.html) because I already addressed all of the points that you brought up in that post.

But to reiterate:

The gore is the point actually

I get that. It is not a good point. And that has always been one of my primary issues with the show.

We must always take the context in mind when discussing media and this series is ultimately was presented as a moe series first and a magical girl series second

And since (theoretically) something that's gruesome cannot be cute the show does it's best to present the cute element as evil and perverted underneath is cuteness


And that is EXACTLY where the show fails. It's not deconstructing anything or making any sort of point because despite all of the grimdarkviolence it's still incredibly moe and even though everybody knows the real content of the show by now it's still being aggressively marketed with moe artwork and moe merchandise. This means that the intended audience gets to have their cake and eat it too; they can fap fap fap all they want to the moe moe little girls and the violent elements of the show do nothing to interfere with or deconstruct that shameless fanboy pandering.

It's like complaining that Jackass is crass, of course is crass but you judge it in comparison to other crass shows

It is perfectly legitimate to complain that Jackass is crass and that pointless crassness makes for shitty television, therefore Jackass is a shitty show. But that is neither here nor there as you seem to be basing your poorly-constructed defense of MM on the fact that I'm... comparing it to other deconstructive magical girl shows? Even though I'm not.

Madoka is for people who go "OMG MOE! fapfapfap" and that should be taken into account while disscusing it

I HAVE been taking that in to account when discussing this. In fact that is EXACTLY THE POINT OF THIS POST. (*facepalm*)

(Anonymous) 2011-03-06 11:26 am (UTC)(link)
I've been defending Madoka? Really? My apologies, it seems my calling Madoka moe fap anime didn't come across as quite disapproving enough; I've implied as hard as I could in my posts that although Madoka is a decontruction is not a very good one sorry again if this wasnot apperent enough
Let's try this, in my previous posts after I put something in quotes add HURR DURR to the quote, that should clear things

I been posting this because I've yet to see you compare it to anything but magical girl shows (your comment about Panty & Stocking was on how the fandom response annoyed you nothing more) not something on it's level, like let's say, Shuffle

I'm glad you mention the failure of the show attempt at deconstruction trough violence, although I've have to disagree on the why it fails, the marketing been cute it's part of the intent, to lure to unsuspecting viewer into it just to shock him with it's violence and exposing the horror inherent in it's moeness; but it fails because quite a few of the target audience have no problem in fetishizing that same violence

Now on to the heart of the matter

I've been posting this comments because your criticism of the show seem quite frankly off-base which is what irks me, your criticism of the show seems, to me at least based on a)how the fandom portraits the show not the show itself and b)how it doesn't measure up to magical girl shows who's demographic and intent where wildly different (honestly to all appearances you do seem to be comparing it to nothing but other deconstructive magical girl shows)

In short it make you seem like someone who is complaining about X-force based on how annoying it's fans are and how it's nothing like Tintin, not on how it fares either by itself or in comparison to other superhero comicbooks
ext_6355: (Default)

[identity profile] nenena.livejournal.com 2011-03-06 11:47 am (UTC)(link)
Shuffle? Shuffle?! Is "on the same level" as Madoka Magica?!

What the fuck are you smoking (and where can I get some)?

Here, let me break it down for you:

1. In my previous post I said that the fandom response to MM annoyed me. It is ONE of the problems that I have with the show. It is not the only problem. It is never invalid to criticize fan reaction to a show, despite your opinion to the contrary.

2. In my previous post I compared MM to other deconstructive magical girl shows and - once again - that is not my ONLY criticism of the show. But I explicitly compared MM to other deconstructive magical girl shows that are intended for an adult male moe-embracing audience (particularly Uta-Kata). I also compared MM to deconstructive magical girl shows that are aimed at a female audience in order to point out that a) anybody praising the show for being the "first" attempt at deconstructing magical girl was really fucking wrong and b) YES IT IS VALID TO COMPARE MADOKA MAGICA TO OTHER DECONSTRUCTIVE MAGICAL GIRL SHOWS INTENDED FOR A DIFFERENT AUDIENCE in order to show how MM's attempt at deconstruction fails because of the creepy audience that MM it is intended for.

The intended audience is one of the criticisms that I am making of the show.

I repeat: The intended audience is one of the criticisms that I am making of this show. The combination of MM's intended message + its intended audience is one of the ways in which the show goes HORRIBLY WRONG.

I've been posting this comments because your criticism of the show seem quite frankly off-base which is what irks me,

I'm irked by the fact that you continually fail to understand a single criticism that I'm making but that you're oblivious enough to complain about how my criticisms aren't *good enough* for you or whatever the fuck.

(Anonymous) 2011-03-06 12:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Ok let me get this straight

1st- On what basis exactly do you support your claim that is fair to criticize a work because of it's fandom? I posit the opposite since it's not as it's not something within the work itself and i.e. just because (some at least) Trekkies are crazy does it mean Star Trek is a bad show

2nd- First let me say Uta-Kate is the one of the shows you mentioned the I've not watched so I apologize for my ignorance in that instance; second what exactly is the intended message you say the show has? I've already said that it seems the message it's "the moe in your show is skin deep and if things where real you woudn't find it moe anymore"
but for all appearances you seem to be saying the message it's "girl empowerment is bad" which is quite frankly not the intended message (the writer has been quite clear that his intent is to dispatch any "things that humans called happiness" trough his whole career; or in other words that he denounces silly hopeless dream not any attitudes that may me damaging to japanese society or women getting "out of hand")

Finally I believe believe should pay more attention to how they structure their opinions including their criticisms since poor form only cheapens their argument
which is why I initially posted, cause your criticisms seem ratter muddy subtracting from your opinion
ext_6355: (Default)

(1 of 2)

[identity profile] nenena.livejournal.com 2011-03-06 01:19 pm (UTC)(link)
To answer your first point: More than one basis, actually. First, when sending a specific message to a specific audience is clearly part of the intent of the work and the aforementioned specific audience reacts in the completely opposite manner from what the creators intended, then it is fair to point to this reaction as evidence of an epic failing of the work itself. In this case the creators of MM were going for "deconstructing magical girl" and they got "OMG MOE FAP FAP FAP" instead, and this is clearly a result of the failings of the show's design, direction, marketing, and conception from the get-go. That is the criticism that I am making in this post, not my first post. Second, it is perfectly fair to criticize the fans of a work for heaping upon it praises that it does not deserve - such as the many who claim that either MM is the "first" deconstruction of magical girl or that it even succeeds in deconstructing anything at all - and THAT was the criticism that I was making in my first post. Not a criticism of the show, but a criticism of the fandom.

See, this thing that I'm doing? Where I'm making more than one argument because I have more than issue with the show and/or its fandom? You seem to have a real problem understanding that. It apparently makes your little head explode trying to understand the fact that I am making different arguments because I have more than one problem with the show.

second what exactly is the intended message you say the show has? I've already said that it seems the message it's "the moe in your show is skin deep and if things where real you woudn't find it moe anymore" but for all appearances you seem to be saying the message it's "girl empowerment is bad" which is quite frankly not the intended message

I don't know how many times I can repeat this or how I can state it using any smaller words, but here goes: I UNDERSTAND THAT THE SHOW IS NOT INTENDING TO SAY THAT FEMALE EMPOWERMENT IS BAD. But whatever message it IS trying to send - whether that message is "magic is false empowerment" or "magical girl tropes aren't empowering when you think about it" or Urobuchi's asinine "deconstructing happiness" message or whatever - it is FAILING to send that message. And because the show is poorly-written and poorly-thought-out, the only point that it HAS (unintentionally) made so far is that female empowerment is bad. It doesn't matter that this isn't the message that the creators intended, it is the only message that is showing up in the work because the creators are failing to get across their intended message.

Finally I believe believe should pay more attention to how they structure their opinions including their criticisms since poor form only cheapens their argument which is why I initially posted, cause your criticisms seem ratter muddy subtracting from your opinion

"poor form"

HOW CAN YOU NOT SEE THE IRONY IN THIS.

You cannot fucking type. You cannot fucking punctuate your sentences correctly. You use commas and apostrophes in the wrong place. You cannot read, apparently. You got up on your high horse about how my criticisms "irked" you for not being *good enough* yet, for example, you complained about me not comparing MM to other deconstructive magical girl shows intended for an adult male audience while completely missing how I compared MM to Uta-Kata at length in my original post and in the comments there. Either way your original complaint that it was unfair to compare MM to other girl shows was idiotic anyway because you misunderstood the two separate arguments I was making and two separate reasons that I was doing so.

Your complaints about my criticisms? Sorry, they're just not good enough for me.
ext_6355: (Default)

(2 of 2)

[identity profile] nenena.livejournal.com 2011-03-06 01:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm done wasting my time with you, 189.216.78.112. If you're really *~so concerned~* about other people on the internet making arguments in ways that you personally *~approve of~*, then get your own livejournal or blog and make your own fucking arguments. Stop acting like a jackass and setting yourself up as the Argument Police.

And forgive me for poo-pooing the idea that you're even remotely qualified to be complaining about other people making criticisms in "poor form" in the first place, given the mindboggling lack of coherent writing ability and reading comprehension that you've shown in this thread so far.

I can't ban you from my journal since I wouldn't want to punish the rest of my generally awesome (and far more intelligent than you) anonymous commentators by turning off anon posting, so let me just go ahead and throw this out here: Please, for the love of puppies, shut the fuck up and stop spraying your stupid all over this entry. If you want to keep responding and feel the desperate need to once again attempt to prove your point that... my arguments aren't good enough for you, or whatever the fucking reason you decided to show up here in the first place - then just get your own journal or wordpress blog or whatever and make your damn point over there.

I'm going out with some friends now, please don't ruin my day by leaving another asinine comment here.

(Anonymous) 2011-03-06 01:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Sorry that I offended you and that my though apparently weren't conveyed clearly enough

[identity profile] cykstar.livejournal.com 2011-03-11 05:05 am (UTC)(link)
I never thought about the targeted demographic. It explains why all the male bloggers love this series so much.

This third reason is a big reason as to why I can't stand...a lot of crap that floats around not just in anime, but Asian pop groups (GOD Korean girl groups UGH), etc etc.

Oddly, I really like this series, but hot damn it ain't no Princess Tutu or Utena.

[identity profile] chelseacandy.livejournal.com 2011-03-17 11:12 am (UTC)(link)
This post got me curious so I watched the first episode and half of the second. As a magical girl anime fanatic, this is definitely not a magical girl anime, it almost reminds me of shakugan no shana in that there is a girl with powers, but the plot is dark and twisty. I too figured out the general plot, and I suppose it could be interesting to watch and see where it goes, but the show does not make me feelgood when I watch it so I may not get there. I definitely would not compare it to say, Utena, which was a shoujo anime but original, dark, and epic. It's as if someone where to make a show about sports, but focus the story on the drama of the characters rather than being about sports. The show is about magical girls, but clearly is not a magical girl/shoujo anime, nor is it meant to be enjoyed as so. It's just a new way for male otaku to enjoy shoujo anime, with all the goodies a Seinen anime could ask for.

One of the only things that I liked was the artistic trippy dimensions they go into, they almost remind me of Takeshi Murakami art. And damn that little critter Kyubey is creepy!

[identity profile] chelseacandy.livejournal.com 2011-03-17 11:14 am (UTC)(link)
excuse my horrible spelling errors...1:00 a.m. makes me stooopid

[identity profile] hazardswake.livejournal.com 2011-04-15 06:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Very interesting post. I was thinking of seeing this series hoping for something like the Magical Girl genre crossed with something dark, but after reading this, I think this may not be what I'm looking for. (Not to mention, the whole NO GIRLS YOU CANNOT HAVE EMPOWERING MAGIC TALES or whatnot sounds genuinely upsetting.)

Studio SHAFT already has one strike against them in my book for MariaHolic, a show that "deconstructs" yuri by having a lesbian paired with a malicious cross-dresser in a comedy where the bulk of the jokes are "let's make life hell for this girl and have the cross-dresser guy keep degrading her for her sexual preference." After that, the idea that they can deconstruct a magical girl show without it being horrible seems slim.

And their animation has always been garbage. I really liked their "Sayonara Zetsubou Sensei" when I first watched it (despite some problematic messages in it) but even then their animation was ultra-cheap. One of the early episodes in their "Bakemonogatari" anime consists of the lead male having a very long conversation with the lead female in a park and using (aside from one moment) static shots.
ext_6355: (Default)

[identity profile] nenena.livejournal.com 2011-04-16 05:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Yyyyeaaaah, MariaHolic was fail on so many levels that it still amazes me how much some (mostly straight cis male) bloggers love the show to pieces. On top of being homophobic it's also transphobic as all get-out.

One of the early episodes in their "Bakemonogatari" anime consists of the lead male having a very long conversation with the lead female in a park and using (aside from one moment) static shots.

Probably because they blew their entire animation budget on that opening panty shot of Tsubasa. (No but in all seriousness I've never seen that much attention to detail and such a high frame rate lavished upon a lingering shot of cameltoe outside of an actual hentai anime before.)

Not to mention, the whole NO GIRLS YOU CANNOT HAVE EMPOWERING MAGIC TALES or whatnot sounds genuinely upsetting.

It is upsetting, especially given how deconstructing the whole "magic is good" thing actually should make for some pretty interesting storytelling, but SHAFT in all of their mediocrity simply failed to separate their deconstruction of wishes/magic/miracles from the specifically gendered expression of power that is a mahou shoujo series. Uta-Kata neatly sidestepped the issue simply by having both magical girls *and* magical boys in its universe, therefore allowing the writers to spin a really excellent critique of the types of tropes and morals that magical girl shows normally rely on without also tearing down the idea of empowering little girls at the same time.

Page 1 of 3