"Edit: Oh yeah, forgot to add. You asked me to point out what offensive stereotypes you used in your comments. I already did three comments up, but once again: AMERICAN. FLAG. The fact that you're still arguing that Loughner burning an American Flag on video is evidence that he's a deranged killer - and that you even opened up your very first comment on the matter with that bit of "evidence" as if it were clearly the most convincing proof that you needed to present! - is all the proof that *I* need to know that you aren't even intelligent enough to hold your own in a conversation about mental health."
Again, how many times do I have to point out that it is less the action and more of HOW he did the action, his reasons given for said action, and his thought process for doing said action?
"But please, do spend another two hours furiously researching links on the internet so that you can comment with another 1000-word comment in order to completely fail at actually addressing any of the points in my original post again. Please. Because I'm totally not sick of engaging a trolling idiot in a pointless argument at all."
Wow. Really now? My responses are not really going to change anything at this point are they? But, hey, you can claim what you will about me failing to defend my own points, but really, it is you that fell into that trap, and it is sad, really. The original posts at least had some thought put into them. Now it is just a round-about that is going no where and getting more and more insulting, with less and less evidence, and with you responding to less and less of my points. Also, I don't have to defend Sarah Palin since, really, she doesn't need my help for that. My intent was to bring a different perspective to this over politicizing of a tragedy only to spew more hatred against people they don't agree with, without the real facts to what really resulted in the heinous attacks on innocent people. I feel I did enough to address the original issue that political rhetoric on either side had nothing to do with the Tucson shooting and that Sarah Palin is being unfairly labeled in this instance. All the evidence in the world probably won't change your view anyway. I will now stop taking up your time.
no subject
Again, how many times do I have to point out that it is less the action and more of HOW he did the action, his reasons given for said action, and his thought process for doing said action?
"But please, do spend another two hours furiously researching links on the internet so that you can comment with another 1000-word comment in order to completely fail at actually addressing any of the points in my original post again. Please. Because I'm totally not sick of engaging a trolling idiot in a pointless argument at all."
Wow. Really now? My responses are not really going to change anything at this point are they? But, hey, you can claim what you will about me failing to defend my own points, but really, it is you that fell into that trap, and it is sad, really. The original posts at least had some thought put into them. Now it is just a round-about that is going no where and getting more and more insulting, with less and less evidence, and with you responding to less and less of my points. Also, I don't have to defend Sarah Palin since, really, she doesn't need my help for that. My intent was to bring a different perspective to this over politicizing of a tragedy only to spew more hatred against people they don't agree with, without the real facts to what really resulted in the heinous attacks on innocent people. I feel I did enough to address the original issue that political rhetoric on either side had nothing to do with the Tucson shooting and that Sarah Palin is being unfairly labeled in this instance. All the evidence in the world probably won't change your view anyway. I will now stop taking up your time.