"Actually, I assumed that he was being overly facetious."
Ah, sorry, bad wording on my part - I didn't doubt that. My statement was meant to suggest that I was sure you didn't believe that he was seriously trying to argue that WW's outfit was identical to underwear, not that you wouldn't believe that what he was saying was facetious. I are good with words, sometimes.
And thanks for editing the post, it's a small issue, but as I'm a particularly petty man, little things like that bother me ^_^
no subject
Ah, sorry, bad wording on my part - I didn't doubt that. My statement was meant to suggest that I was sure you didn't believe that he was seriously trying to argue that WW's outfit was identical to underwear, not that you wouldn't believe that what he was saying was facetious. I are good with words, sometimes.
And thanks for editing the post, it's a small issue, but as I'm a particularly petty man, little things like that bother me ^_^